|
Written by FW de Klerk Foundation
|
|
Friday, 03 September 2010 |
|
In a speech on 2 September at Herzlia School in Cape Town, FW de Klerk warned against the threat that demographic representivity and cultural hegemonism pose to minority rights and to cultural and language diversity.
De Klerk pointed out that our Constitution makes full provision for the protection of minorities. It recognizes that in complex societies such as our own the maintenance of national unity paradoxically requires respect for diversity. Our Constitution accordingly recognizes and protects all kinds of diversity – including race, gender, marital status, sexual preference, social status, age, language and culture. The new South Africa had been founded on the premise of the equality of all our people and all our communities. “It is based on the notion that no-one - no majority, no minority, no individual - should ever again be able to unjustly deprive anyone - whether a majority, a minority or an individual - of any fundamental right. The foundation of our historic national accord was that henceforth relationships between the state and citizens would never again be governed by the arbitrary decisions of this or that group or party - but by the carefully crafted and nationally agreed precepts of the Constitution.” |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Nic Borain
|
|
Friday, 20 August 2010 |
|
The ArcelorMittal /Imperial Crown Trading deal (in all its complexity) is deeply threatening to the future of investment in South Africa.
If I ran a display indicating threat levels to the South African democracy the readings would be higher now than at any time since the successful establishment of majority rule in 1994. Such a statement is obviously subjective. So here goes: South Africa's future depends on sustainable economic growth. This is the minimum condition that must be met if we are to roll back the current levels of unemployment, poverty and inequality. The minimum condition for economic growth to occur is for domestic and international investors to continue to put their money and creativity to work in the country - preferably on an ever expanding scale. Investors, domestic or international, are always primarily concerned with the safety of their asset and the predictability of returns. "Political risk", for investors is the risk that the actions or inactions of government could affect their ownership of their asset and what they can expect to earn from that asset. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by ArcelorMittal
|
|
Thursday, 12 August 2010 |
|
ARCELORMITTAL SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED (Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa) (Registration Number 1989/002164/06) Share code: ACL ISIN : ZAE000134961 ("ARCELORMITTAL SOUTH AFRICA") TERMS OF ARCELORMITTAL SOUTH AFRICA BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT ("BEE") OWNERSHIP TRANSACTION AND FURTHER CAUTIONARY ANNOUNCEMENT HIGHLIGHTS - In line with ArcelorMittal South Africa`s commitment to transformation objectives as enunciated in the country`s empowerment legislation, the finalisation of a transaction providing for equity ownership in respect of 26% of ArcelorMittal South Africa`s operating assets through BEE SPV and ESOP Newco, with an aggregate transaction value of R 9.075 billion.
- Facilitation by ArcelorMittal South Africa of participation by BEE SPV and ESOP Newco.
- Broadening and transforming ownership base in respect of ArcelorMittal South Africa`s operating assets.
- BEE SPV participation through the Ayigobi Consortium led by Sandile Zungu, which includes new entrants, women, youth and strategic groups. ESOP Newco will consist of an employee share ownership plan.
- Contribution to broad-based BEE equity ownership complying beyond the 10 years and 25% target as required by the Broad-Based BEE Codes of Good Practice.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Piet le Roux
|
|
Friday, 25 June 2010 |
|
According to a report in Die Burger (“Afrikaners can’t play for Bafana,” 22/06/2010) Mr. Floyd Shivambu, ANC Youth League spokesperson, has commented on whether or not our national soccer team, Bafana, should be subject to demographic representivity. Asked what he had to say to Afrikaners who are unhappy about Bafana “not being representative of the country as a whole,” Shivambu answered: “They are crazy. Totally.” He asked if anyone has ever seen an “Afrikaner who can be picked to play for Bafana”.
Mr. Shivambu has a point: teams should be picked on merit and not on race. Accordingly, it is also completely acceptable if t the great majority of the French soccer team - or the American athletics team - is not demographically representative of their particular countries. Mr. Shivambu is correct for three reasons. In the first place the argument for demographic representivity is illogical. The answer to the question of who should play for Bafana is not to be found in the demographics of the population of the country, but in Bafana’s requirements as a soccer team. Bafana requires a soccer team that can win matches and one day, perhaps, give South Africa a chance of winning the World Cup. This principle applies equally to the greater soccer field of South Africa. Elections to public office and appointments to private and public posts should be based on merit and not race. People in the private sector should be free to form associations and partnerships with whomever they like as long as there is no discrimination with regard to appointments and promotions. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Sapa
|
|
Friday, 25 June 2010 |
|
South Africa's affirmative action laws do not apply to foreigners working in the country, Labour Minister Membathisi Mdladlana said on Wednesday. "Provisions are made in the regulations for employers to record and report on foreign nationals separately, however, they are not targeted for affirmative action," Mdladlana said in reply to a Parliamentary question from the Inkatha Freedom Party. The minister said that the Employment Equity Act sought to eliminate discrimination and implement affirmative action measures to ensure the representation of black people, women and people with disabilities. "The affirmative action part only applies to designated employers and individuals from the designated groups." Mdladlana was also asked whether it was permissible for an employer to refuse to fill a post if a qualified white candidate had applied but there were no suitable black candidates. "Where a South African black candidate is not available for a post, and if all things are equal, the South African white candidate should receive preference," he said. Originally published by Polity.org.za |
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 9 of 26 |